The Renaissance"Ration & Reason"

In m any slip counseling the devastating imp phone number of the Bubonic Plague (the Black Death) glowering many individuals away from the church for an answer to the meat of life. rather many turned to science for such answers and rational design. In this way modern science was begun and rational thought became cavitied against religious mysticism. Use of the intellect and man's capacity for rational thought were the main virtues of the individual. This is not to say that all(a) those who felt up this way were loathsomenessless men. Indeed, in the literary works of individuals like Pomponazzi, we are expressly told that there is a difference between acting virtuous and being virtuous. It is a condition that has proscriptions attached to it. As Pomponazzi writes in The Im perniciousity of the Soul: " iodine who acts conscientiously, expecting no other reward than virtue, chafferms to act far more than virtuously and purely than he who expects virtually reward beyond virtue. And he who shuns vice on handbill of the foulness of vice, not because of the idolise of due punishment for vice, seems more to be praised than he who avoids vice on account of the fear of punishment as in the verses: ?The good hate sin from love of virtue, / The evil hate sin from fear of punishment'" (394). One can see that acti

Boccaccio, Giovanni. Decameron. Trans. By G. H. McWilliam, New York: Penguin, 1972, pp. 26-33.

The focus on the individual during the Renaissance does not imagine that those who learned toward ration and intellect were atheists. Nor does it mean that those who believed in the index number of the individual to use ration to discover the meaning of life were opposed to the concept of a higher power or the soul of world beings. The rise of secular humanism and the human as the focus of the center of the universe, including rational thought, does not mean either that individuals who could attain a highly developed whizz of intellect and ration could discern all of the mysteries of life. Perhaps we see such notions most clearly expressed in the writings of Pomponazzi.

For in his discussion of whether or not the soul is mortal or immortal, he makes references to both St. Thomas Aquinas and Plato. His shutting is that when such learned or religious figures disagree on an answer to one of life's mysteries, more often than not it is a mystery that only the presence of a God could scan its answer. In The Immortality of the Soul he writes:

We see a humanism emerging in the writings of writers writing during the Renaissance. In Boccaccio's knowledgeability to the Decameron, we see that the bubonic plague played a major role in changing society. It was the devastation and fear of this plague that helped the individual become the center of the universe while bout away from traditional institutions of the church. Giovanni Boccaccio even notes the frustration many individuals felt because of the hopelessness of praying to god as a means of providing aegis from the onslaught of the plague: "Numerous instructions were issued for the safeguarding of the people's health, but all to no avail. Nor were the countless petitions humbly directed to God by the pious, whether by means of formal processions or in any other guise, any less ineffectual" (27).

In the supra passage from P
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.