The Government Doesnt Have A Moral Responsibility To Provide Funding For Post-secondary Education

Running Head : Moral dutyThe Government Does Not energise A Moral Responsibility To ProvideFunding For Secondary Education[Name of Student][Name of University]According to Eshleman (2004 , Moral Responsibility is always thought of in an individual sense and manifests itself in one of two ways . Where people assume a task , it is there lesson right to see it in reality being carried out or where one assumes the risks and rewards arising out of a situation . Following from this , the concept of collective moral responsibility arises . According to Risser (2006 , many philosophers have proposed that just as individuals , corporations and governments besides have moral responsibilities .

However , with the advent of private endeavour and the increasing role of governments as regulators reenforcement secondary facts of life has become a point of much contention amongst academic and government intelligentsia as they seek to establish whether moral responsibility on behalf of the government exists in this regard or not and , if it exists , to what degree is the government responsible . To the naked substance , given the advances that free market capitalism has made , the increase role of the government is skeptic and hence the hypothesis that stands for test is that the government does not stand morally responsible for funding secondary educationThe government is obligated to serve the best interests of its citizensAccording to Jupp (2000 , The roseola duties of government are three First , to protect the field of study territory secondly to preserve peace within its boundaries and third to ensure that every family...If you want to get a climb essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .