There are several considerable problems with the manner in which the Mazak case has been reported in the Kentucky Post , but apprehend to the root of them requires a deeper look at how the watchword is beingness covered and why . The case study as provided bring forths the credit line that the only public come to is the employees of the friendship and perhaps the local anesthetic community . This is inaccurate and misconstrues the idea of journalism for the great serious , the concept of virtue ethics as used in the industry . First , Mazak is the American arm of an international company with thousands of employees worldwide ( Mazak , Your Partner in Innovation 2007 . Though it is a privately-held corporation , large financial impacts such as lovable or losing a case involving multi-million dollars accusations are likely to afford reverberations through the local business community at the truly least . In addition , the accusation is that the ungodliness prexy s actions gave his company an inside trace to business with Mazak . As journalists , we maintain no way to identify what opposite companies might hold back attempted to do business with Mazak and were denied the opportuntiy because of the unfair business practices in play . In this case , it is our duty in reportage the news to inform other companies that they may give birth suffered unfairly at the hands of the former vice president and have legal recourseThis duty is tempered , of course , by our right not to tar and feather the vice president until he has had his day in tap . We must report the news as it happens and attempt to report both sides of the story . The impuissance in this story as reported is that it apparently involved no attempt by the reporter to investigate the severeness of the vice president s claims that Mazak was aware of his financial amuses in the other company .

Specifically , it would have been more ethical for the court reporter to review the court documents d and indicate if the vice president had been able to show any evidence documentation his claim . Likewise , it would be in the best interest of the news and the is the ethical duty of the reporter to attempt to root if indeed a state or federal investigating into the allegations against the vice president is pending . Any reporter habitual to veering the courts will know that it is unusual for a polite suit to proceed rapidly (hence why this was two eld after the fact , but would also know that if thither were allegations of a violation of Kentucky law and allegations of violations of federal law , as were made at the employee meeting , it would be unusual for the probe to have taken longer than the court caseSome of the ethics questions raised(a) by the case study cannot be argued because it does not make it clear who knew what and when . Should the news have held off on the reportage until a verdict was reached in one of the lawsuits ? If...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderessayIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page:
write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.